If he was at Duke he would have played *this* year.
Posted 17 April 2019, 10:23 a.m.
I agree, although it's an interesting situation. I don't think he'll be drafted highly, but I also don't think he has anything to gain by staying another year.
Posted 3 April 2019, 7:52 a.m.
Glad to hear it's on his mind and he's addressing it. Maybe this signals the end of a) call a timeout followed by a false start, b) my favorite: first play of an offensive series and have a delay of game.
Posted 3 April 2019, 7:47 a.m.
It *is* a great idea! I wish I could get up there for it.
Posted 26 March 2019, 10:17 p.m.
This is probably an impossible statistic to generate, and at some level too subjective, but I would be interested in knowing the percentage of contested/uncontested three pointers. We still have defensive screening mistakes resulting in wide open threes.
In the games we win, the opponent doesn't hit them. When the opponent hits them, we lose. Again, just my subjective eyeball assessment. Maybe in some of those cases, the wide open shooter is someone we don't mind taking that shot.
Posted 18 March 2019, 10:05 p.m.
It *is* a bad look, regardless of the shape Beaty left the program in. A contract is a contract.
Posted 13 March 2019, 5:06 p.m.
The team that beat UCLA in the bowl game in Hawaii was pretty darned good. KU and K-State both ended up in the top 10 that year. Mason did a good job here.
Posted 7 February 2019, 2:57 p.m.
That's interesting information. And I do get your "In a way" caveat. But a lot of those kids played last year, didn't they? And were they Juco signings? In any case they would have a max of three years of eligibility left, and likely less. Or maybe some of them redshirted. Clearly *I'm* not informed enough.
It would be nice to have had a couple OLs this year with a full four years of eligibility, but Coach Miles was in a position where he had to make some compromises, so I'll just trust his judgement.
Posted 7 February 2019, 9:24 a.m.
A lot of great talent here. I'm excited!
But I'm wondering, are we so loaded at OL that we don't need even *one* in this class?
Posted 6 February 2019, 10:47 a.m.
I can certainly sympathize with skepticism over anything to do with KU football, and I have some myself. Looking from another perspective, though, we now have a staff of coaches, including the head coach, that have coached in power five conferences in the position they're now holding here. That's something we haven't had in a while.
Could they be past their prime, and could the whole thing blow up spectacularly? Sure, we're KU! But this is a different approach than the last failed approaches. This at least makes some logical sense.
Posted 23 January 2019, 12:07 p.m.